On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:34:50PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/29/15 13:09, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > + > > +Kconfig recursive dependency limitations > > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > + > > +If you've hit the Kconfig error: "recursive dependency detected" you've run > > +into a recursive dependency issue with Kconfig. Kconfig does not do > > recursive > > +dependency resolution, this has a few implications for Kconfig file > > writers. In > > maybe s/,/;/
Fixed. > > +practice it means that for instance if a driver A selects a few kconfig > > symbols > > +another driver B which selects any of these symbols cannot negate any of > > the > > +symbols the driver A selected. Because of this current limitation > > developers > > +who run into this type of recursive dependency issue have two diverging > > +options: > > + > > + a) Either swap all "select FOO" to "depends on FOO" or, > > + b) Change the offending "depends on FOO" to "select FOO" > > + > > +Kconfig's limitations can be addressed by implementing a SAT solver for it, > > +but until then, Kconfig is limitted to require developers to use one of > > limited > I've re-written this section, thanks for the review. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
