On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 01:49:31PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote: > Hi all, > Since some point between July and Sep, I have been suffered from a strange > "very slow write" issue and on Sep 9 I reported it to LKML (but got no > reply): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/9/290 > > The issue is: under high CPU and disk I/O pressure, *some* processes can > suffer from a very slow write speed (e.g., <1MB/s or even only 20KB/s), while > the normal write speed should be at least dozens of MB/s. > > I think I identified the commit which introduced the regression: > ext4: implement cgroup writeback support > (https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=001e4a8775f6e8ad52a89e0072f09aee47d5d252) > > This commit is already in the mainline tree, so I can reproduce the issue > there too: > With the latest mainline, I can reproduce the issue; after I revert the > patch, I can't reproduce the issue. > > When the issue happens: > 1. the read speed is pretty normal, e.g.. it's still >100MB/s. > 2. 'top' shows both the 'user' and 'sys' utilization is about 0%, but the > IO-wait is always about 100%. > 3. 'iotop' shows the read speed is 0 (this is correct because there is indeed > no read request) and the write speed is pretty slow (the average is <1MB/s > or even 20KB/s). > 4. when the issue happens, sometimes any new process suffers from the slow > write issue, but sometimes it looks not all the new processes suffers from > the issue. > 5. The " WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 6782 at fs/inode.c:390 ihold+0x30/0x40() " in > my Sep-9 mail may be another different issue. > 6. To reproduce the issue, I need to run my workload for enough long time > (see the below). > > My workload is simple: I just repeatedly build the kernel source ("make > clean; make -j16"). My kernel config is attached FYI. > > I can reproduce the issue on a physical machine: e.g., in my kernel building > test with my .config, it took only ~5 minutes in the first 176 runs, but > since the 177th run, it could take from 10 hours to 5 minutes - very unstable. > > It looks it's easier to reproduce the issue in a Hyper-V VM: usually I can > reproduce the issue within the first 10 or 20 runs. > > Any idea?
Are you using cgroups? That patch really shouldn't impact load unless there are actual IO controls in place. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
