Sudip, I can take a look at the Jack Steiner patches. Was there anything in the set of 3 patches that you sent that still needs a review?
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:48:16PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi Dimitri, > I have taken these patches which were having ACK from you. Apart from > these I saw another series of 25 patches from Jack Steiner <stei...@sgi.com> > which will still apply almost cleanly but there was no ACK or review. > Can you please have a look at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/19/289 > or if you want I can take them and mail to you. > > Hi Greg, > As discussed the first two are the old unapplied patches with maintainer > ACK. I have mentioned the reference url individually in each patch for > your verification. I have only considered those which are having > maintainer ACK. > The last patch is a new one by me. There was another pending patch with > maintainer ACK but that patch will not apply and is not relevant now. > But the error which my new patch solves was found while checking that > old patch. > > Ohhh .. and there was also one more old patch from 2009, git log shows > that also was not applied. Just guess who the submitter was ...... > > gre...@suse.de :) > > reference at: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/58189/ > > regards > sudip > > Manuel Schölling (1): > sgi-gru: use time_before() > > Rickard Strandqvist (1): > misc: sgi-gru: gruhandles.c: Remove unused function > > Sudip Mukherjee (1): > drivers/misc/sgi-gru: fix return of error > > drivers/misc/sgi-gru/gruhandles.c | 6 ------ > drivers/misc/sgi-gru/gruhandles.h | 1 - > drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grumain.c | 4 +++- > drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grutlbpurge.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
