> > > > Also, I'm finding that the patch series introduces a pretty large > > bisection hole: > > > > include/linux/page-flags.h: In function 'PageYoung': > > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'PF_ANY' > > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have > > 'int') > > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have > > 'int') > > > > which later gets fixed up by > > page-flags-rectify-forward-declaration.patch. > How to test this? Should I apply them on top of v4.2 and bisect? And I > don't see any relation between the first two patches and this patch of > the series, then how does it fail in bisect? Am I missing something? > Confused.. :( > > > > Maybe it's time to do a wholesale refactoring of the patchset? > If this patch is the first in the series will that help? > And besides I got the auto mail from you that the patch is applied. > Now totally confused.. :( Ohhh ..all the time you were talking about Kirill's patch set and I kept thinking you are mentioning about this patchset. :)
regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
