> Thanks for testing. Please could you confirm whether the same behaviour > is observed without the patches, just to make absolutely sure that isn't > a regression.
So i tested this now. I have two FEC interfaces. One i my main access interface, and the second is used by DSA to access switches. With your patches, the module Used by count is equal to the number of interfaces which are up. Without your patches, the count is always 0. When i try to remove the fec module, without your patches, but DSA still using the interface, i get the same kernel:unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth1 to become free. Usage count = 1 as with your patch. So this is not a regression. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
