Hello, Aleksa. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:42:38AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > Does it make sense for the PIDs controller to allow a user to set a > limit of 0? Since we don't cancel attaches, a limit of 0 doesn't > affect anything (nothing stops attaches, and you need to have a > process in the PIDs cgroup in order for fork()s to be affected by the > limit). So I think that attempting to set pid.limit to 0 should return > an -EINVAL.
I don't know. Why does it matter? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
