Ping, Could you someone help to review this patch?

Thanks
Minfei

On 09/10/15 at 04:09pm, Minfei Huang wrote:
> From: Minfei Huang <mnfhu...@gmail.com>
> 
> There is a buffer_head lru list cache in local cpu to accelerate the
> speed. The LRU management algorithm is simple enough in
> bh_lru_install().
> 
> There are three situtaions we should deal with.
> 1) All/part of the lru cache is NULL.
> 2) The new buffer_head hitts the lru cache.
> 3) The new buffer_head does hit the lru cache.
> 
> We put the new buffer_head at the head of lru cache, then copy the
> buffer_head from the original lru cache, and drop the spare.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnfhu...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/buffer.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 1cf7a53..2139574 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1287,8 +1287,6 @@ static inline void check_irqs_on(void)
>   */
>  static void bh_lru_install(struct buffer_head *bh)
>  {
> -     struct buffer_head *evictee = NULL;
> -
>       check_irqs_on();
>       bh_lru_lock();
>       if (__this_cpu_read(bh_lrus.bhs[0]) != bh) {
> @@ -1302,25 +1300,35 @@ static void bh_lru_install(struct buffer_head *bh)
>                       struct buffer_head *bh2 =
>                               __this_cpu_read(bh_lrus.bhs[in]);
>  
> -                     if (bh2 == bh) {
> +                     if (bh2 == NULL) {
> +                             /* Rest value in bh_lrus.bhs always is NULL */
> +                             break;
> +                     } else if (bh2 == bh) {
>                               __brelse(bh2);
>                       } else {
> -                             if (out >= BH_LRU_SIZE) {
> -                                     BUG_ON(evictee != NULL);
> -                                     evictee = bh2;
> +                             if (out == BH_LRU_SIZE) {
> +                                     /*
> +                                      * this condition will be happened,
> +                                      * only if none of entry in
> +                                      * bh_lrus.bhs hits the new bh,
> +                                      * so the last bh should be released.
> +                                      */
> +                                     BUG_ON(in != BH_LRU_SIZE - 1);
> +                                     __brelse(bh2);
> +                                     break;
>                               } else {
>                                       bhs[out++] = bh2;
>                               }
>                       }
>               }
> -             while (out < BH_LRU_SIZE)
> -                     bhs[out++] = NULL;
> -             memcpy(this_cpu_ptr(&bh_lrus.bhs), bhs, sizeof(bhs));
> +             /*
> +              * it is fine that the value out may be smaller than
> +              * BH_LRU_SIZE. The rest of the value in bh_lrus.bhs is NULL.
> +              */
> +             memcpy(this_cpu_ptr(&bh_lrus.bhs), bhs,
> +                             sizeof(struct buffer_head *) * out);
>       }
>       bh_lru_unlock();
> -
> -     if (evictee)
> -             __brelse(evictee);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to