On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:56:12AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > I found at least all the IDs listed from drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c but you > might be right that they might be (don't know) with pnpbios.
The entries in acpi_pnp.c mean "If this device is declared in an ACPI table, create a PNP device". TPMs are kind of at the cutoff where some vendors may have shipped non-ACPI systems with TPMs that were declared via pnpbios, so there's a (small) risk that there are some people using TPMs tied to PNP devices without a corresponding ACPI device. > Maybe a better solution would to have two tables and have only MSFT0101 > in tpm_acpi_tbl in order to make sure that old functionality is not > broken up because we want this also to the stable kernels. I'd agree here. -- Matthew Garrett | [email protected] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
