On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 05:38:10AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:10:47 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo requested I keep my debug check for the preempt_count invariant.
> > 
> > Requested-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/core.c |    4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -2514,6 +2514,10 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(str
> >      *
> >      * Also, see FORK_PREEMPT_COUNT.
> >      */
> > +   if (unlikely(WARN_ONCE(preempt_count() != 2*PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET,
> 
> Nuke the "unlikely" it's redundant with the WARN_ONCE().

Ah, indeed. *poof*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to