On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:13:55PM +0000, 河合英宏 / KAWAI，HIDEHIRO wrote:
> Peter saids -tip tree doesn't have panic_on_unrecovered_nmi in the
> previoius discussion, but it still exists. So, I didn't change
> anything about panic_on_unrecovered_nmi.
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
> > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, const
> > char *name)
> > #endif
> >
> > if (panic_on_unrecovered_nmi)
> > - panic("NMI: Not continuing");
> > + nmi_panic("NMI: Not continuing");
> >
> > pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n");
> >
I was looking at unregister_nmi_handler() because that's the function
the diff points to. That still doesn't have panic_on_unrecovered_nmi.
It looks like your diff tool is 'broken' and generates nonsense function
data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
