On 10/2/2015 4:30 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:

To simplify and prevent memory leakage when unbinding, use
the devm_ memory allocation calls.

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>
---
   net/dsa/dsa.c | 6 +++---
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
index c59fa5d..98f94c2 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_setup_one(struct dsa_switch *ds, 
struct device *parent)
       if (ret < 0)
           goto out;

-    ds->slave_mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
+    ds->slave_mii_bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc(parent);
       if (ds->slave_mii_bus == NULL) {
           ret = -ENOMEM;
           goto out;
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ dsa_switch_setup(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, int index,
       /*
        * Allocate and initialise switch state.
        */
-    ds = kzalloc(sizeof(*ds) + drv->priv_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+    ds = devm_kzalloc(parent, sizeof(*ds) + drv->priv_size, GFP_KERNEL);
       if (ds == NULL)
           return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
           goto out;
       }

-    dst = kzalloc(sizeof(*dst), GFP_KERNEL);
+    dst = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dst), GFP_KERNEL);
       if (dst == NULL) {
           dev_put(dev);
           ret = -ENOMEM;


    Shouldn't you remove the correspoding kfree(), etc. calls?

MBR, Sergei

The corresponding kfree() calls were all missing.

Then this patch should be for net, not net-next. Either that, or add the kfree() calls first, then remove them in this net-next patch.

Neil

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to