On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:57:21 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Monday 05 October 2015 16:53:39 Gabriel Laskar wrote: > > this patch expose the timerfd apis to the userland. It is already in > > glibc header sys/timerfd.h but not synchronised, and missing the ioctl > > number definition. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabr...@lse.epita.fr> > > > > What happens if you include both sys/timerfd.h and linux/timerfd.h then? It will conflict, yes, what should I do? make the kernel header in a way that this will not conflict, or just patch the glibc headers too? > > header-y += telephony.h > > header-y += termios.h > > header-y += thermal.h > >+header-y += tiemrfd.h > > header-y += time.h > > header-y += times.h > > header-y += timex.h > > s/tiemrfd/timerfd/ I miss that, I really need to me more careful about this. Will send a correction for this part. -- Gabriel Laskar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
