> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Rapoport [mailto:mike.rapop...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 11:48 AM
> To: katz Itai-RM05202 <itai.k...@freescale.com>
> Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; a...@arndb.de;
> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yoder Stuart-
> B08248 <stuart.yo...@freescale.com>; Sharma Bhupesh-B45370
> <bhupesh.sha...@freescale.com>; Rivera Jose-B46482
> <german.riv...@freescale.com>; ag...@suse.de; Hamciuc Bogdan-
> BHAMCIU1 <bhamc...@freescale.com>; Erez Nir-RM30794
> <nir.e...@freescale.com>; Wood Scott-B07421
> <scottw...@freescale.com>; Pan Lijun-B44306 <lijun....@freescale.com>;
> Marginean Alexandru-R89243 <r89...@freescale.com>;
> dan.carpen...@oracle.com; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> <richard.schm...@freescale.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: fsl-mc: abstract test for whether a dprc is 
> a
> root dprc
> 
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:09:51AM +0300, itai.k...@freescale.com wrote:
> > From: Itai Katz <itai.k...@freescale.com>
> >
> > Instead of relying on assumptions about fields in data
> > structures, abstract the test for whether a dprc is a root
> > dprc into a function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Itai Katz <itai.k...@freescale.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-
> mc/bus/mc-bus.c
> > index 2aaeb3a..6a6c5a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-bus.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> >
> >  static struct kmem_cache *mc_dev_cache;
> >
> > +static bool fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(struct device *dev);
> 
> Prefer defining functions before they are used rather than using forward
> declarations.

Thanks for the comment.
Since this patch was already added in Greg's staging git tree, I'll consider 
fixing this in a separate cleanup patch.

> 
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * fsl_mc_bus_match - device to driver matching callback
> >   * @dev: the MC object device structure to match against
> > @@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct
> device_driver *drv)
> >      * Only exception is the root DPRC, which is a special case.
> >      */
> >     if ((mc_dev->obj_desc.state & DPRC_OBJ_STATE_PLUGGED) == 0
> &&
> > -       &mc_dev->dev != fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root)
> > +       !fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(&mc_dev->dev))
> >             goto out;
> >
> >     /*
> > @@ -215,6 +217,14 @@ bool fsl_mc_bus_exists(void)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsl_mc_bus_exists);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * fsl_mc_is_root_dprc - function to check if a given device is a root dprc
> > + */
> > +static bool fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +   return dev == fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int get_dprc_icid(struct fsl_mc_io *mc_io,
> >                      int container_id, u16 *icid)
> >  {
> > @@ -500,7 +510,7 @@ void fsl_mc_device_remove(struct fsl_mc_device
> *mc_dev)
> >                     mc_dev->mc_io = NULL;
> >             }
> >
> > -           if (&mc_dev->dev == fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root)
> > +           if (fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(&mc_dev->dev))
> >                     fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root = NULL;
> >     }
> >
> > @@ -726,7 +736,7 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_remove(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >     struct fsl_mc *mc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > -   if (WARN_ON(&mc->root_mc_bus_dev->dev !=
> fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root))
> > +   if (WARN_ON(!fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(&mc->root_mc_bus_dev-
> >dev)))
> >             return -EINVAL;
> >
> >     fsl_mc_device_remove(mc->root_mc_bus_dev);
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> > http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to