Building the advansys driver in a big-endian configuration such as
ARM allmodconfig shows a warning:

 drivers/scsi/advansys.c: In function 'adv_build_req':
 include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:32:26: warning: large integer 
implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
  #define __cpu_to_le32(x) ((__force __le32)__swab32((x)))
 drivers/scsi/advansys.c:7806:22: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_to_le32'
   scsiqp->sense_len = cpu_to_le32(SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);

It turns out that the commit that introduced this used the cpu_to_le32()
incorrectly on an 8-bit field, which results in the sense_len to always
be set to zero, as the SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE value gets moved to upper
byte of the 32-bit intermediate.

This removes the cpu_to_le32() call to restore the original version.

I found this only by looking at the compiler output and have not done
a full review for possible further endianess bugs in the same driver.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Fixes: 811ddc057aac ("advansys: use DMA-API for mapping sense buffer")
---
Using [email protected], as the address listed in MAINTAINERS
failed:

Failed to transport message. Message sending failed since the following 
recipients were rejected by the server: [email protected] (The server responded: 
Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable invalid DNS MX or A/AAAA 
resource record)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/advansys.c b/drivers/scsi/advansys.c
index 4305178e4e01..1c1cd657c380 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/advansys.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/advansys.c
@@ -7803,7 +7803,7 @@ adv_build_req(struct asc_board *boardp, struct scsi_cmnd 
*scp,
                return ASC_BUSY;
        }
        scsiqp->sense_addr = cpu_to_le32(sense_addr);
-       scsiqp->sense_len = cpu_to_le32(SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);
+       scsiqp->sense_len = SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE;
 
        /* Build ADV_SCSI_REQ_Q */
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to