On 10/07/2015 11:54 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 09:11 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> But what's wrong with the GCC attribute mechanism?  Surely GCC ought
>> to be able to generate the code, at least in the simple cases, and the
>> attribute already exists.  The attribute and READ_ONCE_NOCHECK seem
>> like the least messy in the C code.
> 
> The problem with 'no_sanitize_address' attribute is incompatibility with 
> inlining. 
> GCC can't inline function with that attribute into function without it.
> And the contrary is also true - GCC can't inline function without attribute 
> into function with such attribute.
> 
> Failure to inline always_inline function leads to build failure.
> And under CONFIG_OPTIMIZE=n 'inline' means 'always_inline'.
> 
> include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:
> 
> #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING) ||              \
>     !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) || (__GNUC__ < 4)
> #define inline                inline          __attribute__((always_inline)) 
> notrace
> 

Huh, 'inline' effectively means 'always_inline' on every arch, except x86.
This looks like a bug IMO.
Allowing gcc to uninline functions marked 'inline' could be beneficial for some 
arches/configs.

$ git grep ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING
        arch/tile/Kconfig:config ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING
        arch/x86/Kconfig:config ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING
        include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:#if 
!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING) ||           \

$ git grep OPTIMIZE_INLINING
        arch/x86/Kconfig.debug:config OPTIMIZE_INLINING
        arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig:CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y
        arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig:CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y
        arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.c:#undef 
CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING
        include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:    !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) || 
(__GNUC__ < 4)
        kernel/configs/tiny.config:CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to