On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:44:32PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Wu, is there a tag one can include to ward off this patch sucking robot > > prematurely? > > Yes. The best way may be to push the patches to a git tree known to > 0day robot: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/tree/repo/linux > > So that it's tested first there. You'll then get private email reports > if it's a private git branch.
Right, but if I can't be bothered to compile test a patch, I also cannot be bothered to stuff it into git :-) > We may also add a rule: only send private reports for patches with > "RFC", "Not-yet-signed-off-by:", etc. How about not building when there's no "^Signed-off-by:" at all? Even private build fails for patches like this -- esp. 3+ -- gets annoying real quick. Also note that this 'patch' has: $subject ~ /^Re:/, nor did it have "^Subject:" like headers in the body. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
