On 11/28/06, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Ingo,
> I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your
> 2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I
> am unable to build the realtime-lsm package against them so no reason
> to reboot.
>
> I know there were some comments awhile back about being required to
> switch to PAM. Has that occurred?
>
> If not then there is a regression issue for realtime-lsm.
As Realtime LSM is an out of tree module and there's no stable kernel
module API it's impossible to prevent regressions.
That being said, the realtime LSM patch is so simple that it should work
- how exactly does it fail?
Lee
Hi Lee,
The failure is a Gentoo sandbax failure. On the surface of it I
didn't really think it was a kernel problem but I know you've pushed
me to move to PAM telling me realtime-lsm wasn't going to work in the
future. I really just wanted to know that PAM was now a requirement
instead of only best practice.
Thanks,
Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
