* Prarit Bhargava <pra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> re-ping on this. Just making sure this wasn't dropped on the floor.
So I didn't apply it back when I saw your patch because I didn't see where you
addressed/analyzed the second paragraph of hpa's review:
"The downside with set is that it only sets a single byte, the upside is that
it
always outputs 0 or 1, and apparently if the output variable is your bool
gcc
can use that for optimization."
That's a valid concern and should be addressed.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
