On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:41:41PM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote: > > > On 10/07/15 22:51, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > >I was thinking of not naming it uio at all > > > > U mean doing something completely orthogonal to UIO? And how did u thing to > access bars? With UIO or implement this functionality in the new configfs > too? > If yes - then it will essentially be UIO with MSI-X support, won't it? ;) > It'll also be the third user-space drivers infrastructure and I'm not sure > there is enough motivation add it. > Note that "some on this thread" are claiming that even two is too many... ;)
Let's wait to see what happens here, I talked to Stephen and I think that a non-UIO driver might be the correct solution here. At the very least, the proposed patches are not acceptable, so it can't be any worse :) greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
