On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:03:25 +0200 Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > If we picked up patch "kernel: Avoid softlockups in > > stop_machine() during heavy printing" from my series (it's completely > > independent, I've attached the latest version), the result would look less > > hacky to me (attached). Thoughts? > > Haven't tested it but should also work... Well, I expect we'll be merging Jan's lockup-avoidance code fairly soon. There's no point in solving the same problem twice. Sp please, do take a closer look at the proposed patches and if possible, runtime test them? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
