On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Am 11.10.2015 um 19:58 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> >> +  icoll_add_domain(np, ICOLL_NUM_IRQS);
> >>  
> >> -  icoll_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(np, ICOLL_NUM_IRQS,
> >> -                                       &icoll_irq_domain_ops, NULL);
> >>    return icoll_domain ? 0 : -ENODEV;
> > 
> > In case of !icoll_domain this return is not reached as you paniced
> > already. So why would we still check icoll_domain?
> 
> I'm paniced on !icoll_base, icoll_domain will give only warning.
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c#L52
> 
> Or do i miss some thing?

Yes. Your patch makes that:

>> +    if (!icoll_domain)
>> +            panic("%s: unable add irq domain", np->full_name);

Thanks,

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to