On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 03:58:51PM +0800, yalin wang wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 12, 2015, at 15:38, Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > On 10/12/2015 04:40 AM, yalin wang wrote:
> >> Remove unlikely(order), because we are sure order is not zero if
> >> code reach here, also add if (page == NULL), only allocate page again if
> >> __rmqueue_smallest() failed or alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER == 0
> > 
> > The second mentioned change is actually more important as it removes a 
> > memory leak! Thanks for catching this. The problem is in patch 
> > mm-page_alloc-reserve-pageblocks-for-high-order-atomic-allocations-on-demand.patch
> >  and seems to have been due to a change in the last submitted version to 
> > make sure the tracepoint is called.
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: yalin wang <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +++---
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> index 0d6f540..de82e2c 100644
> >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> @@ -2241,13 +2241,13 @@ struct page *buffered_rmqueue(struct zone 
> >> *preferred_zone,
> >>            spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
> >> 
> >>            page = NULL;
> >> -          if (unlikely(order) && (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER)) {
> >> +          if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER) {
> >>                    page = __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, 
> >> MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC);
> >>                    if (page)
> >>                            trace_mm_page_alloc_zone_locked(page, order, 
> >> migratetype);
> >>            }
> >> -
> >> -          page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype, gfp_flags);
> >> +          if (page == NULL)
> > 
> > "if (!page)" is more common and already used below.
> > We could skip the check for !page in case we don't go through the 
> > ALLOC_HARDER branch, but I guess it's not worth the goto, and hopefully the 
> > compiler is smart enough anyway…
> agree with your comments,
> do i need send a new patch for this ?

Looks like a two patches to me: memory leak and removing always-true part
of condifition.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to