* Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [151012 10:17]: > * Keerthy <a0393...@ti.com> [150901 17:24]: > > > > > > On Tuesday 01 September 2015 11:33 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >* Keerthy <a0393...@ti.com> [150901 10:22]: > > >> > > >> > > >>On Wednesday 26 August 2015 09:29 AM, Keerthy wrote: > > >>>Currently apart from dra7, omap5 and amx3 all the other SoCs > > >>>are identified using cpu_is_* functions which is not right since > > >>>they are all SoCs(System on Chips). Hence changing the SoC > > >>>identification code to use soc_is instead of cpu_is and keeping > > >>>defines for cpu_is where needed. This allows us to replace the > > >>>rest of cpu_is usage along with other fixes as needed. > > >> > > >>Tony, > > >> > > >>A Gentle ping on this. > > > > > >Looks good to me for v4.4. I'll apply it after some testing > > >after -rc1. > > > > Thanks Tony. > > Now with the fixes finally out of the way, applying into > omap-for-v4.4/cleanup.
Uhh actually not applying. This breaks builds quite a bit depending on the .config options chosen: arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:257:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap243x’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:259:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap44xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ... arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:389:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap34xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ... arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:389:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap34xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ... arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:257:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap243x’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:259:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap44xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ... arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Keerthy, can you please test this with just single SoC configurations and run randconfig builds on this overnight. And then we obviously need to test to make sure that this does not break booting on various platforms for multi SoC and single SoC configurations. And then you can repost, please include what all was tested. Thanks, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
