On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:52:08AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:45:08PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > But yeah if you guys want to create a new parameter that gathers nohz > > > and isolcpus I think we can. > > > > Could we also add the rcu settings? > > I thought that I already had. What am I still missing? > > > > task_isolation is really just about tasks so it should be another name. > > > > no_os_cpus? > > > > os_free_cpus? > > os_jitter_free_cpus? > > clean_cpus? > > quiet_cpus? > > I have no problem with any of the names proposed thus far, but obviously > could not resist the urge to propose a few more.
I moved forward quite slowly with nohz full over the years but at least I'm proud that this subsystem introduced some of the most interesting naming challenges! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
