On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:02:00AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42:24PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > Hi Fengguang, > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > Hi Boqun, > > > > > > The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's > > > > > > - subjects > > > - touched files > > > - TO/CC list > > > > > > Log shows the files and TO/CC are strongly related to powerpc, > > > so it looks a natural choice to apply to it. Especially you put > > > "linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org" in the TO list while Peter/Ingo > > > in the CC list -- that looks like a strong indication for powerpc. > > > > > > > Thank you for your explanation, so how about modifying the title to: > > > > [PATCH v3 tip/locking/core 2/6] ... > > > > also works? > > Yes it will work -- that'd be the most strong hint. >
Great! I will use that hint in the future, thank you ;-) > > BTW, does this bot have more tests than 0day? I have pushed this > > patchset to my own repo and had it tested by 0day. > > Yes, it runs git am, the resulted commits are feed to 0day for > build/boot/performance tests. If you've already pushed the patches via > git, the robot should have skip such duplicate tests on the emailed > patches -- unless there is a bug. I'll have a check. > Thank you, so I'm not going to resend this v3 patchset, will use the subject hint for any future patchset ;-) Regards, Boqun
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
