From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varad...@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:49:44 -0400
>
> Consider the following "duelling syn" sequence between two peers A and B:
> A B
> SYN1 -->
> <-- SYN2
> SYN2ACK -->
>
> Note that the SYN/ACK has already been sent out by TCP before
> rds_tcp_accept_one() gets invoked as part of callbacks.
>
> If the inet_addr(A) is numerically less than inet_addr(B),
> the arbitration scheme in rds_tcp_accept_one() will prefer the
> TCP connection triggered by SYN1, and will send a CLOSE for the
> SYN2 (just after the SYN2ACK was sent).
>
> Since B also follows the same arbitration scheme, it will send the SYN-ACK
> for SYN1 that will set up a healthy ESTABLISHED connection on both sides.
> B will also get a CLOSE for SYN2, which should result in the cleanup
> of the TCP state machine for SYN2, but it should not trigger any
> stale RDS-TCP callbacks (such as ->writespace, ->state_change etc),
> that would disrupt the progress of the SYN2 based RDS-TCP connection.
>
> Thus the arbitration scheme in rds_tcp_accept_one() should restore
> rds_tcp callbacks for the winner before setting them up for the
> new accept socket, and also make sure that conn->c_outgoing
> is set to 0 so that we do not trigger any reconnect attempts on the
> passive side of the tcp socket in the future, in conformance with
> commit c82ac7e69efe ("net/rds: RDS-TCP: only initiate reconnect attempt
> on outgoing TCP socket.")
>
> Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varad...@oracle.com>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
