On 10/13/2015 02:37 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Qais Yousef wrote:
+ if (domain == NULL)
+ domain = irq_default_domain; /* need a separate
ipi_default_domain? */
No tail comments please.
We should neither use irq_default_domain nor have an
ipi_default_domain.
OK though I understood that you were OK with using the irq_default_domain.
This means that arch code must parse the DT for an IPI domain. I think
I've seen arch code using the root FDT to search for a specific node.
I'll try to do something similar to search for an IPI domain.
+
+ virq = irq_domain_alloc_descs(-1, nr_irqs, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE);
+ if (virq <= 0) {
+ pr_warn("Can't reserve IPI, failed to alloc descs\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* we are reusing hierarchy alloc function, should we create another
one? */
+ virq = __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(domain, virq, nr_irqs, NUMA_NO_NODE,
+ (void *) dest, true);
+ if (virq <= 0) {
+ pr_warn("Can't reserve IPI, failed to alloc irqs\n");
+ goto free_descs;
+ }
+
+ data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
+ bitmap_copy(data->ipi_mask.cpumask, dest->cpumask, dest->nbits);
+ data->ipi_mask.nbits = dest->nbits;
This does only initialize the first virq data. What about the others?
Right I missed that. I'll fix it.
+ return virq;
+
+free_descs:
+ irq_free_descs(virq, nr_irqs);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * irq_destroy_ipi() - unreserve an IPI that was previously allocated
+ * @irq: linux irq number to be destroyed
+ *
+ * Return an IPI allocated with irq_reserve_ipi() to the system.
That wants to explain that it actually destroys a number of virqs not
just the primary one.
OK I'll expand on that.
Thanks,
Qais
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
