> > I remember Kame has already suggested this idea. In my opinion, > > I still think it's better to add a new migratetype or a new zone, > > so both user and kernel could use mirrored memory. > > A new zone would be more flexible ... and probably the right long > term solution. But this looks like a very clever was to try out the > feature with a minimally invasive patch.
Yes. I agree creating a new zone is the right solution for long term. I believe this approach using MOVABLE_ZONE is good and reasonable for short-term solution. Sincerely, Taku Izumi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
