On 10/14/2015 05:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 10:57:13 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
We just made sure policy->cpu is online and this check will always fail
as the policy is active. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skan...@codeaurora.org>
Applied, thanks!
Rafael
I didn't give a clear ack/review for the series. So, to clarify my
ack/review
For all patches except 4/5, I'm okay with either/all of this:
Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <skan...@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skan...@codeaurora.org>
For 4/5, I would still like us to move the sysfs creating after init.
That part shouldn't be too hard. We don't need to create the sysfs file
before init.
Once that's done, I wouldn't mind giving an Ack.
Thanks,
Saravana
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/