On 10/14/2015 07:52 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:28:55PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
On Oct. Thursday 15 (42) 12:46 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 06:08:34PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
DSA and its drivers currently hook the NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER net_device event in
order to configure the VLAN map of every port.
This VLAN map is a feature of these switch chips to hardcode and restrict which
output ports a given input port can egress frames to.
A Linux bridge is a simple untagged VLAN propagated by the bridge code itself.
With a proper 802.1Q support, a driver does not need this hook anymore, and
will simply program the related VLAN object.
This patchset improves the hardware bridging code in the mv88e6xxx driver with
a strict 802.1Q mode.
Hi Vivien
I just tested this as part of net-next/master, and found a problem....
If i do:
ip link set lan0 up
ip addr add 192.168.10.2/24 dev lan0
It will not ping. Looking in sys/kernel/debug/dsa0/stats i see
broadcast packets, probably ARP, being received at the port.
But they are not being forwarded out the CPU port.
If however i do
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 lan0
ip addr add 192.168.10.2/24 dev br0
ip link set br0 up
i can ping.
So it looks like we are too restrictive by default. You should be able
to use interfaces as they are, without a bridge.
Correct, if the ports are not in a VLAN by default, they cannot talk.
Hi Vivien
This is a regression. Ports of the switch should work like normal
Linux interfaces. And up until now, they did. This patchset changed
that.
As Florian pointed out, these interfaces are separated from each
other. So you need something like a bridge per port by default, which
then gets removed and replaced when a port is added to a Linux bridge.
We also need to take care of VLANs. When the port is not a member of a
linux bridge, i expect all VLAN tagged frames to be received, as well
as untagged frames. This is normal Linux behaviour. But i never got
around to testing this with DSA.
There was a reason for the original code. I had wondered how it is now
supposed to work. Guess this exchange explains it. Looking forward to see
how it is going to be fixed, and too bad I don't have time to be more
involved.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
