On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 18:44 -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> Overload the LSB of struct page* to indicate that it's a page_pool_iov.
>
> Refactor mm calls on struct page* into helpers, and add page_pool_iov
> handling on those helpers. Modify callers of these mm APIs with calls to
> these helpers instead.
>
> In areas where struct page* is dereferenced, add a check for special
> handling of page_pool_iov.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrym...@google.com>
>
> ---
> include/net/page_pool/helpers.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> net/core/page_pool.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h b/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> index b93243c2a640..08f1a2cc70d2 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,64 @@ static inline struct page_pool_iov
> *page_to_page_pool_iov(struct page *page)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline int page_pool_page_ref_count(struct page *page)
> +{
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> + return page_pool_iov_refcount(page_to_page_pool_iov(page));
> +
> + return page_ref_count(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void page_pool_page_get_many(struct page *page,
> + unsigned int count)
> +{
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> + return page_pool_iov_get_many(page_to_page_pool_iov(page),
> + count);
> +
> + return page_ref_add(page, count);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void page_pool_page_put_many(struct page *page,
> + unsigned int count)
> +{
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> + return page_pool_iov_put_many(page_to_page_pool_iov(page),
> + count);
> +
> + if (count > 1)
> + page_ref_sub(page, count - 1);
> +
> + put_page(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pfmemalloc(struct page *page)
> +{
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> + return false;
> +
> + return page_is_pfmemalloc(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pref_nid(struct page *page, int
> pref_nid)
> +{
> + /* Assume page_pool_iov are on the preferred node without actually
> + * checking...
> + *
> + * This check is only used to check for recycling memory in the page
> + * pool's fast paths. Currently the only implementation of page_pool_iov
> + * is dmabuf device memory. It's a deliberate decision by the user to
> + * bind a certain dmabuf to a certain netdev, and the netdev rx queue
> + * would not be able to reallocate memory from another dmabuf that
> + * exists on the preferred node, so, this check doesn't make much sense
> + * in this case. Assume all page_pool_iovs can be recycled for now.
> + */
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> + return true;
> +
> + return page_to_nid(page) == pref_nid;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * page_pool_dev_alloc_pages() - allocate a page.
> * @pool: pool from which to allocate
> @@ -301,6 +359,9 @@ static inline long page_pool_defrag_page(struct page
> *page, long nr)
> {
> long ret;
>
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* If nr == pp_frag_count then we have cleared all remaining
> * references to the page:
> * 1. 'n == 1': no need to actually overwrite it.
> @@ -431,7 +492,12 @@ static inline void page_pool_free_va(struct page_pool
> *pool, void *va,
> */
> static inline dma_addr_t page_pool_get_dma_addr(struct page *page)
> {
> - dma_addr_t ret = page->dma_addr;
> + dma_addr_t ret;
> +
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page))
> + return page_pool_iov_dma_addr(page_to_page_pool_iov(page));
Should the above conditional be guarded by the page_pool_mem_providers
static key? this looks like fast-path. Same question for the refcount
helper above.
Minor nit: possibly cache 'page_is_page_pool_iov(page)' to make the
code more readable.
> +
> + ret = page->dma_addr;
>
> if (PAGE_POOL_32BIT_ARCH_WITH_64BIT_DMA)
> ret <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -441,6 +507,12 @@ static inline dma_addr_t page_pool_get_dma_addr(struct
> page *page)
>
> static inline bool page_pool_set_dma_addr(struct page *page, dma_addr_t addr)
> {
> + /* page_pool_iovs are mapped and their dma-addr can't be modified. */
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page)) {
> + DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
> + return false;
> + }
Quickly skimming over the page_pool_code it looks like
page_pool_set_dma_addr() usage is guarded by the PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP page
pool flag. Could the device mem provider enforce such flag being
cleared on the page pool?
> +
> if (PAGE_POOL_32BIT_ARCH_WITH_64BIT_DMA) {
> page->dma_addr = addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index 138ddea0b28f..d211996d423b 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.cnn
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static struct page *page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(struct
> page_pool *pool)
> if (unlikely(!page))
> break;
>
> - if (likely(page_to_nid(page) == pref_nid)) {
> + if (likely(page_pool_page_is_pref_nid(page, pref_nid))) {
> pool->alloc.cache[pool->alloc.count++] = page;
> } else {
> /* NUMA mismatch;
> @@ -362,7 +362,15 @@ static void page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(struct
> page_pool *pool,
> struct page *page,
> unsigned int dma_sync_size)
> {
> - dma_addr_t dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> +
> + /* page_pool_iov memory provider do not support PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV */
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page)) {
> + DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
> + return;
> + }
Similar to the above point, mutatis mutandis.
> +
> + dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
>
> dma_sync_size = min(dma_sync_size, pool->p.max_len);
> dma_sync_single_range_for_device(pool->p.dev, dma_addr,
> @@ -374,6 +382,12 @@ static bool page_pool_dma_map(struct page_pool *pool,
> struct page *page)
> {
> dma_addr_t dma;
>
> + if (page_is_page_pool_iov(page)) {
> + /* page_pool_iovs are already mapped */
> + DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
> + return true;
> + }
Ditto.
Cheers,
Paolo
