The open() side handles fds in a for loop but close() is based on two
fixed indexes READ and WRITE.

Match the close() side with the open() side by using for loop for
consistency.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvi...@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
index 5a49f07a6c85..36139cba7be8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
@@ -368,10 +368,9 @@ static int get_mem_bw_imc(int cpu_no, char *bw_report, 
float *bw_imc)
                writes += w->return_value.value * of_mul_write * SCALE;
        }
 
-       for (imc = 0; imc < imcs; imc++) {
-               close(imc_counters_config[imc][READ].fd);
-               close(imc_counters_config[imc][WRITE].fd);
-       }
+       for (imc = 0; imc < imcs; imc++)
+               for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
+                       close(imc_counters_config[imc][j].fd);
 
        if (strcmp(bw_report, "reads") == 0) {
                *bw_imc = reads;
-- 
2.39.2


Reply via email to