Now that we have bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb() available and working, we
can tag the attached callback as sleepable, and let the verifier check
in the correct context the calls and kfuncs.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bent...@kernel.org>

---

no changes in v5

changes in v4:
- use a function parameter to forward the sleepable information

new in v3 (split from v2 02/10)
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 13 ++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 7cb1b75eee38..14e4ee67b694 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state {
         * while they are still in use.
         */
        bool used_as_loop_entry;
+       bool in_sleepable;
 
        /* first and last insn idx of this verifier state */
        u32 first_insn_idx;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 458765d881f3..39a16184c0d8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1434,6 +1434,7 @@ static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state 
*dst_state,
        }
        dst_state->speculative = src->speculative;
        dst_state->active_rcu_lock = src->active_rcu_lock;
+       dst_state->in_sleepable = src->in_sleepable;
        dst_state->curframe = src->curframe;
        dst_state->active_lock.ptr = src->active_lock.ptr;
        dst_state->active_lock.id = src->active_lock.id;
@@ -2407,7 +2408,7 @@ static void init_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 /* Similar to push_stack(), but for async callbacks */
 static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_async_cb(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
                                                int insn_idx, int prev_insn_idx,
-                                               int subprog)
+                                               int subprog, bool is_sleepable)
 {
        struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem;
        struct bpf_func_state *frame;
@@ -2434,6 +2435,7 @@ static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_async_cb(struct 
bpf_verifier_env *env,
         * Initialize it similar to do_check_common().
         */
        elem->st.branches = 1;
+       elem->st.in_sleepable = is_sleepable;
        frame = kzalloc(sizeof(*frame), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!frame)
                goto err;
@@ -5279,7 +5281,8 @@ static int map_kptr_match_type(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env,
 
 static bool in_sleepable(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
-       return env->prog->sleepable;
+       return env->prog->sleepable ||
+              (env->cur_state && env->cur_state->in_sleepable);
 }
 
 /* The non-sleepable programs and sleepable programs with explicit 
bpf_rcu_read_lock()
@@ -9493,7 +9496,8 @@ static int push_callback_call(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env, struct bpf_insn *ins
                /* there is no real recursion here. timer callbacks are async */
                env->subprog_info[subprog].is_async_cb = true;
                async_cb = push_async_cb(env, env->subprog_info[subprog].start,
-                                        insn_idx, subprog);
+                                        insn_idx, subprog,
+                                        
is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_impl_kfunc(insn->imm));
                if (!async_cb)
                        return -EFAULT;
                callee = async_cb->frame[0];
@@ -16941,6 +16945,9 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
        if (old->active_rcu_lock != cur->active_rcu_lock)
                return false;
 
+       if (old->in_sleepable != cur->in_sleepable)
+               return false;
+
        /* for states to be equal callsites have to be the same
         * and all frame states need to be equivalent
         */

-- 
2.44.0


Reply via email to