On Sat, Apr 06 2024 at 17:10, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Yes, this changes the "semantics" of check_timer_distribution(), perhaps it > should be renamed.
Definitely.
> But I do not see a better approach, and in fact I think that
>
> Test that all running threads _eventually_ receive
> CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID
>
> is the wrong goal.
>
> Do you agree?
No argument from my side. All we can test is that the leader is not
woken up.
Thanks,
tglx
