Hi Charlie,

On 21/04/2024 03:04, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
This loop is supposed to check if ext->subset_ext_ids[j] is valid, rather
than if ext->subset_ext_ids[i] is valid, before setting the extension
id ext->subset_ext_ids[j] in isainfo->isa.

Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <char...@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.doo...@microchip.com>
Fixes: 0d8295ed975b ("riscv: add ISA extension parsing for scalar crypto")
---
  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 48874aac4871..b537731cadef 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static int __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_ext_list(unsigned 
long *isa2hwcap)
if (ext->subset_ext_size) {
                                for (int j = 0; j < ext->subset_ext_size; j++) {
-                                       if 
(riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->subset_ext_ids[i]))
+                                       if 
(riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->subset_ext_ids[j]))
                                                set_bit(ext->subset_ext_ids[j], 
isainfo->isa);
                                }
                        }


I think this should go into -fixes, let's check with Palmer if he wants to take this patch only or if you should send the patch on its own.

You can add:

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com>

Thanks,

Alex



Reply via email to