On 5/8/24 1:24 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
Hi John,

On 5/8/2024 12:41 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
...
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
index 7946e32e85c8..5fffbc9ff6a4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static bool show_mba_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned 
long *bw_resc)
        /* Memory bandwidth from 100% down to 10% */
        for (allocation = 0; allocation < ALLOCATION_MAX / ALLOCATION_STEP;
             allocation++) {
-               unsigned long avg_bw_imc, avg_bw_resc;
+               long avg_bw_imc, avg_bw_resc;
                unsigned long sum_bw_imc = 0, sum_bw_resc = 0;

nit: since you are touching this line, could you please move it down one line to
establish reverse fir order?

                int avg_diff_per;
                float avg_diff;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
index d67ffa3ec63a..a4c3ea49b0e8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
  static int
  show_bw_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc, size_t span)
  {
-       unsigned long avg_bw_imc = 0, avg_bw_resc = 0;
+       long avg_bw_imc = 0, avg_bw_resc = 0;
        unsigned long sum_bw_imc = 0, sum_bw_resc = 0;
        int runs, ret, avg_diff_per;
        float avg_diff = 0;

Same nit here about reverse fir order.

Thank you very much for sticking with this to fix the warnings.
With the nitpicks addressed you can add:
| Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.cha...@intel.com>


Sure, I'll post another one with those two changes and your rb,
thanks for the review(s)!

thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA


Reply via email to