On 6/3/24 05:54, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format
  string [-Wformat-zero-length]
   197 |         ksft_print_msg("");
       |                        ^~
seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format
  string [-Wformat-zero-length]
   202 |         ksft_print_msg("");
       |                        ^~
seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format
  string [-Wformat-zero-length]
   204 |         ksft_print_msg("");
       |                        ^~

Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
Closes: 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.uj5ug8k9-...@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany <amer.shanaw...@gmail.com>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c
index b83099160fbc..ed04b89de9c6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c
@@ -194,14 +194,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
        ksft_set_plan(7);
ksft_print_msg("Running on:\n");
-       ksft_print_msg("");
+       ksft_print_msg(" ");

Why not delete this all together?

        system("uname -a");
ksft_print_msg("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n");
        /* Avoid using "sysctl" which may not be installed. */
-       ksft_print_msg("");
+       ksft_print_msg(" ");

Why not delete this all together?

        system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable");
-       ksft_print_msg("");
+       ksft_print_msg(" ");

Why not delete this all together?

        system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden");
affinity();

thanks,
-- Shuah


Reply via email to