The control elements with volatile flag don't guarantee that the written values are actually saved for the next reads, hence they aren't suitable for the standard mixer tests. Skip the write tests for those volatile controls for avoiding confusion.
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1d44be36-9bb9-4d82-8953-5ae2a4f09...@molgen.mpg.de Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de> --- tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c index 1c04e5f638a0..3c9a45fb5a29 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c @@ -702,6 +702,13 @@ static void test_ctl_write_default(struct ctl_data *ctl) return; } + if (snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info)) { + ksft_print_msg("%s is volatile\n", ctl->name); + ksft_test_result_skip("write_default.%d.%d\n", + ctl->card->card, ctl->elem); + return; + } + err = write_and_verify(ctl, ctl->def_val, NULL); ksft_test_result(err >= 0, "write_default.%d.%d\n", @@ -827,6 +834,13 @@ static void test_ctl_write_valid(struct ctl_data *ctl) return; } + if (snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info)) { + ksft_print_msg("%s is volatile\n", ctl->name); + ksft_test_result_skip("write_valid.%d.%d\n", + ctl->card->card, ctl->elem); + return; + } + switch (snd_ctl_elem_info_get_type(ctl->info)) { case SND_CTL_ELEM_TYPE_BOOLEAN: pass = test_ctl_write_valid_boolean(ctl); @@ -1039,6 +1053,13 @@ static void test_ctl_write_invalid(struct ctl_data *ctl) return; } + if (!snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info)) { + ksft_print_msg("%s is volatile\n", ctl->name); + ksft_test_result_skip("write_invalid.%d.%d\n", + ctl->card->card, ctl->elem); + return; + } + switch (snd_ctl_elem_info_get_type(ctl->info)) { case SND_CTL_ELEM_TYPE_BOOLEAN: pass = test_ctl_write_invalid_boolean(ctl); -- 2.43.0
