On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:37:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> @@ -616,6 +616,10 @@ static int write_and_verify(struct ctl_data *ctl,
>       if (!snd_ctl_elem_info_is_readable(ctl->info))
>               return err;
>  
> +     /* Skip the verification for volatile controls, too */
> +     if (snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info))
> +             return err;
> +

I think we should do the checks in test_ctl_get_value() still - a read
and then ctl_value_is_valid() on whatever we read.  It doesn't need to
match the value we wrote but it should still be valid for the control.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to