From: Geliang Tang <tanggeli...@kylinos.cn>

Run bpf_tcp_ca selftests (./test_progs -t bpf_tcp_ca) on a Loongarch
platform, some "Segmentation fault" errors occur:

'''
 test_dctcp:PASS:bpf_dctcp__open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_dctcp:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/1    bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:FAIL
 test_cubic:PASS:bpf_cubic__open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_cubic:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/2    bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:FAIL
 test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:dctcp_skel 0 nsec
 test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:bpf_dctcp__load 0 nsec
 test_dctcp_fallback:FAIL:dctcp link unexpected error: -524
 #29/4    bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:FAIL
 test_write_sk_pacing:PASS:open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_write_sk_pacing:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/6    bpf_tcp_ca/write_sk_pacing:FAIL
 test_update_ca:PASS:open 0 nsec
 test_update_ca:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 settcpca:FAIL:setsockopt unexpected setsockopt: \
                                        actual -1 == expected -1
 (network_helpers.c:99: errno: No such file or directory) \
                                        Failed to call post_socket_cb
 start_test:FAIL:start_server_str unexpected start_server_str: \
                                        actual -1 == expected -1
 test_update_ca:FAIL:ca1_ca1_cnt unexpected ca1_ca1_cnt: \
                                        actual 0 <= expected 0
 #29/9    bpf_tcp_ca/update_ca:FAIL
 #29      bpf_tcp_ca:FAIL
 Caught signal #11!
 Stack trace:
 ./test_progs(crash_handler+0x28)[0x5555567ed91c]
 linux-vdso.so.1(__vdso_rt_sigreturn+0x0)[0x7ffffee408b0]
 ./test_progs(bpf_link__update_map+0x80)[0x555556824a78]
 ./test_progs(+0x94d68)[0x5555564c4d68]
 ./test_progs(test_bpf_tcp_ca+0xe8)[0x5555564c6a88]
 ./test_progs(+0x3bde54)[0x5555567ede54]
 ./test_progs(main+0x61c)[0x5555567efd54]
 /usr/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x22208)[0x7ffff2aaa208]
 /usr/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xac)[0x7ffff2aaa30c]
 ./test_progs(_start+0x48)[0x55555646bca8]
 Segmentation fault
'''

This is because "link" returned by bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() is
NULL in this case. test_progs crashs when this NULL link passes to
bpf_link__update_map(). This patch adds NULL checks for all links
in bpf_tcp_ca to fix these errors. If "link" is NULL, goto the newly
added label "err" to destroy the skel.

v2:
 - use "goto err" instead of "return" as Eduard suggested.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeli...@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c        | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index fa2efb246d3b..45a21a064437 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -407,7 +407,8 @@ static void test_update_ca(void)
                return;
 
        link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
-       ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+               goto err;
 
        do_test(&opts);
        saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
@@ -421,6 +422,7 @@ static void test_update_ca(void)
        ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca2_cnt, 0, "ca2_ca2_cnt");
 
        bpf_link__destroy(link);
+err:
        tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
 }
 
@@ -443,7 +445,8 @@ static void test_update_wrong(void)
                return;
 
        link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
-       ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+               goto err;
 
        do_test(&opts);
        saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
@@ -456,6 +459,7 @@ static void test_update_wrong(void)
        ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, saved_ca1_cnt, "ca2_ca1_cnt");
 
        bpf_link__destroy(link);
+err:
        tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
 }
 
@@ -480,7 +484,8 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
        ASSERT_OK_PTR(link_nl, "attach_struct_ops_nl");
 
        link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
-       ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+               goto err;
 
        do_test(&opts);
        ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, 0, "ca1_ca1_cnt");
@@ -489,6 +494,7 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
        ASSERT_ERR(err, "update_map");
 
        bpf_link__destroy(link);
+err:
        bpf_link__destroy(link_nl);
        tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
 }
@@ -532,7 +538,8 @@ static void test_link_replace(void)
        bpf_link__destroy(link);
 
        link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_2);
-       ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops_2nd");
+       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops_2nd"))
+               goto err;
 
        /* BPF_F_REPLACE with a wrong old map Fd. It should fail!
         *
@@ -555,6 +562,7 @@ static void test_link_replace(void)
 
        bpf_link__destroy(link);
 
+err:
        tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to