On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:06:58 +0200
Claudio Imbrenda <imbre...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 14:57:03 +0200
> Christoph Schlameuss <schlame...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Add a test case manipulating s390 storage keys from within the ucontrol
> > VM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlame...@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
> >
[...]
> > + /* set register content for test_skey_pgm to access not mapped memory*/
> >
>
> missing space before */
>
Fixing...
> > + sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
> > + sync_regs->gprs[5] = self->base_gpa;
> > + sync_regs->gprs[6] = test_vaddr;
> > + run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
> > +
> > + run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_CRS;
> > + TH_LOG("set CR0 to 0x%llx", sync_regs->crs[0]);
> > +
> > + self->sie_block->ictl |= ICTL_OPEREXC | ICTL_PINT;
> > + self->sie_block->cpuflags &= ~CPUSTAT_KSS;
> > + run->psw_mask = 0x0400000180000000ULL; /* DAT enabled + 64 bit mode */
> > + run->psw_addr = self->code_gpa;
> > + ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> > + ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
> > + ASSERT_EQ(0, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> > + ASSERT_EQ(13, run->exit_reason);
>
> can you use macros here instead of magic values?
>
> > + ASSERT_EQ(40, sie_block->icptcode);
>
> same here
>
Yes, I should have done that from the beginning.
[...]
