There are a couple of spelling mistakes in ksft_test_result_fail messages.
Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.k...@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
index 1dd94197da30..6838c561e4c9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ int main(void)
        ksft_print_msg("vl = %lu\n", vl);
 
        if (datap[0] != 0x00 && datap[0] != 0xff) {
-               ksft_test_result_fail("v-regesters are not properly 
initialized\n");
+               ksft_test_result_fail("v-registers are not properly 
initialized\n");
                dump(datap, vl * 4);
                exit(-1);
        }
 
        for (i = 1; i < vl * 4; i++) {
                if (datap[i] != datap[0]) {
-                       ksft_test_result_fail("detect stale values on 
v-regesters\n");
+                       ksft_test_result_fail("detect stale values on 
v-registers\n");
                        dump(datap, vl * 4);
                        exit(-2);
                }
-- 
2.39.2


Reply via email to