On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 11:53:25 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > What do people think: Do we leave it as an exercise to the BPF-developer > to deduct hardware detected a wrong/failed checksum, as that is possible > as described above. Or do we introduce a CHECKSUM_FAILED?
I vote we leave it unless someone has a strong use case for FAILED. Checksumming and dropping packets should be pretty cheap, it's not worth complicating the stack with another option.
