On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 12:25:37PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 07:41:38PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > Introduce the capability to send TCP traffic over IPv6 to > > > nft_flowtable netfilter selftest. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > .../selftests/net/netfilter/nft_flowtable.sh | 47 > > > +++++++++++++++------- > > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/netfilter/nft_flowtable.sh > > > b/tools/testing/selftests/net/netfilter/nft_flowtable.sh > > > index > > > 1fbfc8ad8dcdc5db2ab1a1ea9310f655d09eee83..24b4e60b91451e7ea7f6a041b0335233047c6242 > > > 100755 > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/netfilter/nft_flowtable.sh > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/netfilter/nft_flowtable.sh > > > @@ -127,6 +127,8 @@ ip -net "$nsr1" addr add fee1:2::1/64 dev veth1 nodad > > > ip -net "$nsr2" addr add 192.168.10.2/24 dev veth0 > > > ip -net "$nsr2" addr add fee1:2::2/64 dev veth0 nodad > > > > > > +ip netns exec "$nsr1" sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1 > /dev/null > > > +ip netns exec "$nsr2" sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1 > /dev/null > > > for i in 0 1; do > > > ip netns exec "$nsr1" sysctl net.ipv4.conf.veth$i.forwarding=1 > > > > /dev/null > > > ip netns exec "$nsr2" sysctl net.ipv4.conf.veth$i.forwarding=1 > > > > /dev/null > > > @@ -153,7 +155,9 @@ ip -net "$ns1" route add default via dead:1::1 > > > ip -net "$ns2" route add default via dead:2::1 > > > > > > ip -net "$nsr1" route add default via 192.168.10.2 > > > +ip -6 -net "$nsr1" route add default via fee1:2::2 > > > ip -net "$nsr2" route add default via 192.168.10.1 > > > +ip -6 -net "$nsr2" route add default via fee1:2::1 > > > > > > ip netns exec "$nsr1" nft -f - <<EOF > > > table inet filter { > > > @@ -352,8 +356,9 @@ test_tcp_forwarding_ip() > > > local nsa=$1 > > > local nsb=$2 > > > local pmtu=$3 > > > - local dstip=$4 > > > - local dstport=$5 > > > + local proto=$4 > > > + local dstip=$5 > > > + local dstport=$6 > > > local lret=0 > > > local socatc > > > local socatl > > > @@ -363,12 +368,12 @@ test_tcp_forwarding_ip() > > > infile="$nsin_small" > > > fi > > > > > > - timeout "$SOCAT_TIMEOUT" ip netns exec "$nsb" socat -4 > > > TCP-LISTEN:12345,reuseaddr STDIO < "$infile" > "$ns2out" & > > > + timeout "$SOCAT_TIMEOUT" ip netns exec "$nsb" socat -${proto} > > > TCP${proto}-LISTEN:12345,reuseaddr STDIO < "$infile" > "$ns2out" & > > > > Hi Lorenzo, > > > > Some minor nits: > > > > 1. This line is (and was) excessively long. > > Maybe it can be addressed as the line is being modified anyway. > > > > Flagged by checkpatch > > > > 2. Prior to this patch, variables on this line were enclosed in "" to > > guard against word splitting when expansion occurs. > > This is no longer the case. > > > > Flagged by shellcheck > > > > > lpid=$! > > > > > > busywait 1000 listener_ready > > > > > > - timeout "$SOCAT_TIMEOUT" ip netns exec "$nsa" socat -4 > > > TCP:"$dstip":"$dstport" STDIO < "$infile" > "$ns1out" > > > + timeout "$SOCAT_TIMEOUT" ip netns exec "$nsa" socat -${proto} > > > TCP${proto}:"$dstip":"$dstport" STDIO < "$infile" > "$ns1out" > > > socatc=$? > > > > Likewise here. > > > > > > > > wait $lpid > > > > Otherwise this LGTM. > > Hi Simon, > > ack, fine. Is it ok to address them in subsequent patch or do you prefer to > address them here?
Hi Lorenzo, No preference on my side. And feel free to include the following either way. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> > @Pablo: what do you prefer?
