On 5/21/26 5:11 PM, Geliang Tang wrote:
From: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
In test_mutliproc(), when send() or recv() returns an error (e.g.,
-1), the test continues to execute the remaining code and fails
repeatedly due to using EXPECT_GE.
For example, if a TLS connection is broken and recv() returns -1,
EXPECT_GE(res, 0) records a failure but does not stop the test.
The test then proceeds with left -= res (where res = -1), causing
left to increase unexpectedly, and the loop continues indefinitely.
This results in a massive number of identical failure messages:
# tls.c:1686:mutliproc_sendpage_writers:Expected res (-1) >= 0 (0)
# tls.c:1686:mutliproc_sendpage_writers:Expected res (-1) >= 0 (0)
... (hundreds of identical failures)
I think it’s worth backporting, so a Fixes tag is necessary.
Fix this by replacing EXPECT_GE with ASSERT_GE. When send() or recv()
fails, ASSERT_GE immediately aborts the current test, preventing
the subsequent undefined behavior and endless failure messages.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
index 30a236b8e9f7..9b9a3cb2700d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
@@ -1549,7 +1549,7 @@ test_mutliproc(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, struct
_test_data_tls *self,
res = recv(self->cfd, rb,
left > sizeof(rb) ? sizeof(rb) : left, 0);
- EXPECT_GE(res, 0);
+ ASSERT_GE(res, 0);
left -= res;
}
} else {
@@ -1566,7 +1566,7 @@ test_mutliproc(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, struct
_test_data_tls *self,
res = send(self->fd, buf,
left > file_sz ? file_sz : left, 0);
- EXPECT_GE(res, 0);
+ ASSERT_GE(res, 0);
left -= res;
}
}