Il giorno lun, 08/06/2009 alle 01.02 -0300, Alexandre Oliva ha scritto: > > If there isn't a license there, it should be taken as under GPLv2.
> If this header is a derivative of the mroute code, under copyright law, > then there might be a need to apply the terms of the mrouted license to > it, which would indeed make it non-Free Software AFAICT. > Yes, no license, but the poor information that it give us leads me to think that. > There are other ways by which mroute.h could have been created, however, > that wouldn't set this requirement. Do you have any evidence that it > was created in a way that would make it a derivative work under > copyright law, rather than under any of the copyright exeptions > (e.g. interface only) or clean-room procedures to ensure it isn't? > > It would be desirable to check the signed-off-by trail of this file and > check how it was created and contributed before declaring it non-Free. > Would you be willing to do that? > i'll do m. -- ------------------------------- SIP address: [email protected] GPG key ID: 0x79631020 ------------------------------- --
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ linux-libre mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsfla.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-libre
