On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
thanks!), and is not the same as raid1+0 (raid1 on top of raid0).
Sorry, that is raid0 on top of raid1. With raid1 on top, then after
the first disk failure, the second failure has a 66% chance of
destroying the data. With raid0 on top, the second failure has only
a 33% chance of destroying the data.
Raid10 is a way of striping the data with redundancy in a single layer.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stu...@gathman.org>
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
