hi,
It’s Ubuntu 18.04.3:
$ lvm version
LVM version: 2.02.176(2) (2017-11-03)
Library version: 1.02.145 (2017-11-03)
Driver version: 4.37.0
$ uname -a
Linux gandalf 4.15.0-72-generic #81-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 26 12:20:02 UTC 2019
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
It’s weird as same error occurred few minutes ago. I wanted to take snapshot of
thin volume and it first returned the following error:
$ lvcreate -s --name vmail-data-snapshot vg1/vmail-data
Using default stripesize 64.00 KiB.
Can't create snapshot vmail-data-snapshot as origin vmail-data is not
suspended.
Failed to suspend thin snapshot origin vg1/vmail-data.
Then I tried with different volume:
$ lvcreate -s --name owncloud-data-snapshot vg1/owncloud-data
Using default stripesize 64.00 KiB.
Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:2) transaction_id is 574, while expected 572.
Failed to suspend vg1/thinpool1 with queued messages.
Same error when then tried to export LXD’s container:
$ lvcreate -s --name owncloud-data-snapshot vg1/owncloud-data
Using default stripesize 64.00 KiB.
Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:2) transaction_id is 574, while expected
572.
Failed to suspend vg1/thinpool1 with queued messages.
I did vgcfgbackup and transaction_id for thinpool1 was 573. I really don’t know
what’s going on.
Wondering if this might be caused by LXD running as snap which is known to not
interact with system's lvmetad and thus giving out of date information. LXD is
configured to use thinpool1 as storage.
Maybe after I did vgcfgbackup, updated mismatching transaction_id and restored
with vgcfgrestore, I got access to data and fake impression all was fixed.
—
Best Regards,
Łukasz Czerpak
> On 9 Dec 2019, at 14:36, Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dne 08. 12. 19 v 21:47 Łukasz Czerpak napsal(a):
>> After googling a lot I figure out what to do and it worked - at least I can
>> access the most critical data.
>> I’ve followed instructions from this blog post:
>> https://blog.monotok.org/lvm-transaction-id-mismatch-and-metadata-resize-error/
>> However, I have no idea what was the root cause of this. I hope I can fully
>> recover the volumes w/o re-creating the whole VG.
>> In case I did something terribly wrong that looked like the solution now,
>> but may cause issues in future - I would appreciate any hints.
>>>
>>> $ lvchange -ay vg1
>>> WARNING: Not using lvmetad because a repair command was run.
>>> Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected
>>> 505.
>
> Hi
>
> What's been you lvm2 & kernel version ?
>
> This difference is too big for 'recent' versions - there should never be more
> then one - unless you are using old kernel & old lvm2.
>
> Regards
>
> Zdenek
>
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
