On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:41:21 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote:

> >  please implement either set_time or set_mmss, not both.
> >  I don't know the chip but I suspect set_time is the one you need.
> 
> OK, I will remove .set_mmss. Got to confused by looking into how
> everything is used...
> BTW, the only remaining users of rtc_set_mmss() seem to be
> arch/sparc/kernel/time_{32,64}.c?

 Yes. The facility is there for drives, not users. For some chips it's easier
 to implement a set_mmss like interface so it's better to have the rtc framewrk
 to convert between the twos than to have repeated code in drivers.

> OK, if I take the result (for both rtc-rp5c01 and rtc-msm6242) through
> the m68k tree?

 that's ok, you can add my acked by.
-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to