Hi Geert,

> Netdev people: are these changes to ne.c acceptable?
>
> If yes, I'll split everything and queue it up (the ne.c part through netdev,
> the rest through m68k).
> If not, do you have a better solution[*]?
> Are there other network drivers using/requiring a similar approach?

smc91x requires the same approach - the only changes necessary there
are to smc91x.h (and Kconfig).

(no patch yet; the code is stuck on my devel PC which refuses to boot ATM).

Cheers,

  Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to